返回列表 回復 發帖

Lawyer website was punished with Deng Xiaoping picture and the inscription produ

's picture page inscription handwriting production,[url=http://unfiny.com/joint/bbs/joyful.cgi/joyful.cgi%20[plm=0]%20get%20http:/joyful.cgi]http://unfiny.com/joint/bbs/joyful.cgi/joyful.cgi%20[plm=0]%20get%20http:/joyful.cgi[/url], industrial and commercial administrative department that the violation of China relevant provisions of the Advertising Law, and its administrative penalties. Wu lawyer filed an administrative action for rescission of punishment. Shanghai Changning District Court revealed today,louboutin pas cher, Changning District Court upheld the decision on punishment of the business sector, does not support the claims Wu lawyers. October 2009, Wu opened in a personal capacity lawyer website called "trace Securities Litigation network",louboutin,http://www.ric.hi-ho.ne.jp/cgi-bin/user/morisame/joyful.cgi, the website of its own design, production and maintenance. Since last December, he used the handwriting of Deng Xiaoping's picture and the inscription "Development is the last word of Deng Xiaoping" at the top of the page. Wu lawyers are still "Development is the last word,http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&rd=1&item=350246435893&ssPageName=STRK:MESE:IT," the former handwriting, computer font in the "Founder Shu body" font plus "claim" the word has become a "claims development is the absolute principle of Deng Xiaoping." Changning Branch Trade and Industry Wu lawyers made in accordance with the law this year May 25 administrative penalties: ordered to stop publishing; ordered to correct it publicly. Wu lawyer refused to accept the punishment to the Changning court administrative proceedings. On the court,http://kristindoestheory.umwblogs.org/#comment-89431, the plaintiff and defendant sides around the plaintiff posted on the site belong to the above advertising practices, and the defendant made the decision whether there is an error of law applicable to the two issues were the focus of intense debate. Through two public hearings, the court found that the plaintiff as a professional lawyer, hosted on their website detailed and visually describes the main business, professional advantages,hogan outlet, contact with lawyers and other business-related information,http://blog.raritan.com/2013/06/in-the-hot-aisle-with-the-data-center-detectives/comment-page-1/#comment-24958, in line with the Advertising Law "directly or indirectly own introduction services provided by certain media and forms of" commercial advertising in the form of regulations,http://rfwxgs.com/bbs/home.php?mod=space&uid=81707&do=blog&quickforward=1&id=123386,louboutin, and therefore the plaintiffs involved in website hosting acts are advertising practices. The court also held that the defendant considered advertising law that "State organs," including the late state personnel,http://konoha.hoikuen.to/cgi/bbs2/yybbs.cgi,parajumpers online shop, whereby the plaintiff an administrative penalty law was correctly applied,http://safemotherhoodproject.org/2013/02/23/first-update-from-el-rodeo/comment-page-1/#comment-709903, shall be determined by law. Then upheld the above administrative punishment decision made by the defendant. (Original title: The picture and the inscription ad Deng lawyer subject to administrative penalties)
返回列表